Open Secrets - Political Ponerology - Audio

in evil •  last month 

This is new.

This is the first episode! And they chose Political Ponerology.

There used to be a full serialised audiobook on YT - can no longer find it. Or rather, it no longer appears, even searching the none-too-popular term "ponerology". However, it does still exist: Chapter One is here. It is a synth-voice, so up to you if you feel audio is better than print.

Download everything, as it may not be there tomorrow.

I do have files, in a folder in a HDD, somewhere. If I find them, I'll upload them. I was just searching for what still exists. Knowledge is being deleted.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE BLURT!
Sort Order:  
  ·  last month  ·  

(IFF) GOD = EXIST (THEN) EXIST = GOD

(in other words, the source and creator of all things is also those things and all things created are pieces of the source)


Posted from https://blurtlatam.com

  ·  last month  ·  

That's Pantheism.
so what?
1 = one

  ·  last month  ·  

logical necessity


Posted from https://blurtlatam.com

  ·  last month  ·  

do you know what IFF means?

  ·  last month  ·  

"if and only if"


Posted from https://blurtlatam.com

  ·  last month  ·  

That isn't a meaning, that's just long-hand.

Your syntax is wrong, hence meaningless.
If we fix the syntax, it becomes a tautology - always true yet meaningless.

p IFF q is equivalent to IF p->q AND IF q->p, THEN p <->q

so, adjusting for syntax, you've written

IF (a=b) AND IF (b=a) THEN (b=a)

mmm...

Amusingly, also TRUE when both propositions are FALSE.

  ·  last month  ·  

also,

Your syntax is wrong, hence meaningless.

QUANTA = MEANINGLESS

QUALIA = MEANINGFUL


Posted from https://blurtlatam.com

  ·  last month  ·  

So you have quantised qualia as having-meaning, and quanta as not-having-meaning, in an attempt to discredit quanta. The paradox is amusing.

  ·  last month  ·  

In logic and related fields such as mathematics and philosophy, if and only if (shortened as iff[1]) is a biconditional logical connective between statements, where either both statements are true or both are false.

The connective is biconditional (a statement of material equivalence),[2] and can be likened to the standard material conditional ("only if", equal to "if ... then") combined with its reverse ("if"); hence the name. The result is that the truth of either one of the connected statements requires the truth of the other (i.e. either both statements are true, or both are false), though it is controversial whether the connective thus defined is properly rendered by the English "if and only if"—with its pre-existing meaning. For example, P if and only if Q means that the only case in which P is true is if Q is also true, whereas in the case of P if Q, there could be other scenarios where P is true and Q is false.


Posted from https://blurtlatam.com

  ·  last month  ·  

well copy-pasted, now apply it to your initial statement.

Hello @rycharde
Thank you for sharing such great content!
Use #blurtconnect tag to get more upvotes from usBlurt to the moon 🌕You can delegate any amount of Blurt power to @blurtconnect-ng
This post has been upvoted manually by @chibuzorwisdomblurtconnect.gifPlease help support this curation account.

Also, keep in touch with Blurtconnect-ng family on Telegram and Whatsapp

  ·  last month  ·  

This post has been upvoted by @blurthispano.
We invite you to use the tag #blurthispano. You can find us on Discord.


Banner.gif
Manually curated by Geeklania.

We invite you to vote for @blurthispano as Witness.

Posted from https://blurtlatam.com

  ·  last month  ·  

the question of "what is evil" is ultimately a red-herring


Posted from https://blurtlatam.com

  ·  last month  ·  

If I find them, I'll upload them.

throw them on odysee.com


Posted from https://blurtlatam.com

  ·  last month  ·  

  ·  last month  ·  

Congratulations, your post has been curated by @techclub


Manually curated by @samhenrytenplus

c362c2cf8c19fc34a19e29e5a2db7acb60e3b4b3 (1).jpg

Follow @techclub for more updates and use tag #techclub for tagging content

you can also delegate to @techclub to support curation

  ·  last month  ·  

Re🤬eD

  ·  last month  ·  

btw I fell asleep listening to the above talk! But feel free to comment on the content. I'll try again in a more wakeful state!

  ·  last month  ·  


@newparadigmtt and I were talking about smart contracts, because he's built like five or six H-E tokens so far.

I mentioned the price discrepancy of BLURT right now as a possible arbitrage opertunity and then went off on a tirade about my favorite 2nd layer Token, BYT! The rest is history as they say 🤬🥓🍔🍟

  ·  last month  ·  

which tokens are his?