Closing Time for @ctime @fervi, dubious apps and what happened in the witness channel!

in blurt •  10 days ago  (edited)



You may have seen the following posts in an attempt to dishonourably leak private chats and wondered what went down, I will bare all shortly in this text.

https://blurt.blog/polish/@fervi/wazne-przykro-mi

https://blurt.blog/decentralization-day/@mariuszkarowski/d-day-countdown-my-log-hears-things-i-cannot-hear#

I have been wary of @fervi for some time now ever since I saw his post about his BLURTL2N project and tested out his app https://blurt2ln.intinte.org/ which coincidentally no longer has a working link.

https://blurt.blog/witness/@fervi/blurt2ln-spend-your-money-how-you-want

These are the comments I left:

It was of concern for me that the fees the app took were not transparent and were 16%+ and it didn't show what max transaction size could be performed. It was very dubious and looked like a user trap on a few levels.

We never really heard about this app again and it is now defunct. (This is the developer @ctime supposedly is touting to replace the foundation)

A few days ago I was approached by my contacts at Hive Watchers, who were complaining that a dev had made a cross-posting tool that was posting random crap to Hive and drawing the wrath of the hive community and breaking the diplomatic relations between Blurt and Hive Watchers, it was alleged the foundation sanctioned and funded this.

They linked me this post: https://hive.blog/polish/@mariuszkarowski/witness-blog-4 which had a link to this cross poster https://crossposter.intinte.org/, it is now defunct but I can tell you I was so shocked at how crude the UI was, looked like some 1995 internet page, it just had a login for you to enter your keys and no support for Keychain, can't say for sure but this looked like a good way to capture user private keys.

I found a screenshot:

image.png

In addition to this, I was told that @fervi was being represented on Hive as CTO of Blurt, having replaced @jacobgadikian. I don't know who spread that info, but it is very false.

I came to be informed that @fervi is a supporter of @ctime who is currently trying to engage in subversive tactics on Blurt and making demands for the foundation to step aside to dupe users into rallying behind the Utopian dream of decentralisation while he and his group lie in wait with 21 mil BP ready to take over consensus and the proposal pool if he succeeds in getting the foundation to neuter itself.

@ctime has on many occassions lorded powering down and crashing the price over the community if he doesn't get his way and latest threats to dox the foundation team which is highly dangerous to the security of Blurt as all hold witness positions, threats of this nature are not to be taken lightly. Other threats include stopping his @ctime rewards bot to punish users (the foundation however has an answer to this with @blurtbooster, an algo bot that will vote all qualifying and non-blacklisted accounts)

The biggest threat is the potential loss of human resources, under threat of doxing and constant social attack. Blurt like all other chains compete for limited dev resources, should conditions become hostile there is no reason why our devs should stay, @ctime had no regard for our team in his demands and couid have come to us in a very diplomatic fashion and said:

"Hey, the 4th is coming up, let's come up with a strategy to decentralise Blurt for the good of the community, here are some ideas and resources I can provide"

But he didn't do that, all he wanted to do was to gain maximum power over users and even thought the foundation would cowtow to him and beg for funding and having to justify every single bit of dev work we do via proposal which he will control, being the then largest stakeholder.

So what happened in the witness channel?

Given the aforementioned threat and the continued bullying that happens on chain by individuals that take freedom of speech too far and use this freedom to threaten other individuals or to threaten the financial stability of the blockchain, which @ctime has done.

I, at the time, approached the witnesses in the channel to gather their thoughts on the notion of giving @ctime notice to wind up his affairs within 30 to 40 days on Blurt before we freeze his account, having been given fair warning, this would extend to bullies on the chain that persecute our users.

EDIT: For clarification purposes, funds will always be SAFU, and even fair warning given to extract them. "Freezing" refers to blocking governance and social functions.

The important thing to note is that I was seeking input and had not made this canon. A fair number of witnesses do agree with this action, some suggested alternatives to freezing, @practicalthought just posted in comment an idea to fork away from the situation, all of which are options that can be considered, including the option to strip @ctime of governance voting powers, renewing blurt.regent for an extended period etc.

The reality is that as Blurt heads to the $0.001 price point that @ctime and @double-u so cavalier laugh about; the cost to take over consenus becomes in the hundreds of thousands of Dollars instead of Millions and makes it ripe for a collusive takeover and destruction, nullifying value for everyone, but these jokers think it is funny and want to engineer that it does get there by spreading FUD.

In fact if the foundation were to remove its consensus vote Blurt could be attacked with less than 100K, that’s why you can’t just blindly follow recommendations without proper research.

At the end of the day when you invest in DPOS you need to realise that it is a governed community and if witness governance wishes to extract the cancer in the community, they are in their right to do so.

Ultimately most are of like mind that @ctime is not good for the community and he should power down and leave, even that is a courtesy that will hurt the price in the short term but we will bounce back from it after.

@fervi is in league with @ctime and is putting out dubious apps which are now defunct anyway, I called him out on these and warned of his association with @ctime, to which he suggested he should leave Blurt and I wished him all the best, not long after he posts threatening to expose the witness private chat, that becomes a matter of chain security as those discussions were precisely about chain security, hence the reason for banning from Discord.

@ctime clearly has no empathy for the community as can be seen in his actions to try downvote and destroy the SBI community on Steem. You can see in this post https://peakd.com/hive/@cryptoandcoffee/absolute-bull that I commented in displeasure that he was using my delegation to downvote this community and wipe out their financial stability. At the time @saboin also ran a project called @ihealyou to help SBI against @ctime's actions which countervoted. Already from 2020 @saboin and I have been doing triage on the damage this individual causes.

In summary, @ctime and his alts are currently considered Blurt enemy #1 by the Blurt Socialgraph Foundation (or Blurt Core if you prefer) and supporting witnesses, anyone continuing to aid and abet his destructive actions will be categorised in the same manner.

It is highly desired that @ctime and his alt accounts leave the Blurt community and he will be afforded the time to do so before any action is taken. Anyone wanting to purchase his stake or portion of it in OTC may contact me and I will suggest a safe way of doing so.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE BLURT!
Sort Order:  
  ·  7 days ago  ·  

I note that even with support from the insiders, and spamming it to every member of Blurt, this post still only achieved less than 1500 total BLURT payout ($9). And you are by far your biggest supporter. In other words, nobody except you and your 3 friends are on board, @megadrive. Whether you intended this or not, your actions have lost you the consent of the community.

You can see how the lines are drawn in the upvotes. It's the "foundation" and those who the foundation supports against everyone else. In other words it's no different then just about every other governing force on the planet. They do for themselves while the population below suffer. Like your and my investment here.

  ·  6 days ago  ·  

I don’t like this at all.

I like @megadrive I really do and believe intentions are good, that said if you can freeze accounts how are we at all decentralized?

FA17FEA4-EBBD-4B1F-AE42-F774D78A144D.jpeg

  ·  6 days ago  ·  

I didn’t know entire situation b4. I have no idea intentions anymore. This is bad that’s all

For real. I've had it here...maybe/probably. I just can't watch poor business decisions be made on a regular basis and have my personal money tied to it. This frozen account thing, was just over the top. Thank god @jacobgadikian was able stop that right in it's tracks.

  ·  7 days ago  ·   (edited)

I haven't spammed this to anyone, if it has been it wasn't organised by me, I even requested the team not pin it. I also do not think this is the true reflection of community sentiment, if you look my post has lots of abusive comments and threats of legal action, I don't blame any community member for not touching this post with a barge pole so as not to get targetted themselves.

The issue is that there is social engineering against the foundation long before this, starting with the decentralisation-day tag and calls to disarm the very foundation (Blurt Core) that protected Blurt in at least three occasions, if that isn't a coup I don't know what is, the community needs to think long and hard what would happen if that expertise and protection weren't there and Blurt were left to its own devices, maybe the Lord of the Flies novel rings true in that case.

  ·  7 days ago  ·  

What was the plan ????

It looks like many of the Double-u and Fervi posts were pure FUD. Intended to drop the price of Blurt.

“The Blurt Foundation must step aside” and hand over control of the Blockchain. Etc etc…

What ? Hand over to whom exactly ?

Maybe this wasn’t the intention, but demands to have all the developers and Blurt Team just quit caused incredible Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt.

F.U.D.

FE56E0F2-5526-4562-AE0D-9E899018261E.jpeg

  ·  6 days ago  ·  

People have right to sell when they wanna. The solution isn’t freezing there accounts, it’s growing our community. I believe @megadrive intentions are good but all is lost if we allow this

It's so easy to like you. You have common sense.

And it's no joke when you say this...key word "all"

all is lost if we allow this

Loading...
  ·  8 days ago  ·  

tag @themarkymark

you're going to love this


Posted from https://blurtlatam.com

  ·  8 days ago  ·  

I don't love or hate it, it is fascinating though.

  ·  8 days ago  ·  

A few days ago I was approached by my contacts at Hive Watchers, who were complaining

WHAT. THE. HELL.

the hive oligarchs have done nothing but trash blurt

we owe them nothing


Posted from https://blurtlatam.com

  ·  8 days ago  ·  

I've maintained a certain amount of diplomacy to reduce the likelihood of our users getting attacked on Hive and to reduce overall blockchain attacks on Blurt, I believe in good diplomatic relations with all blockchains.

  ·  6 days ago  ·  

well, i was somewhat concerned when mega talked about blurt being "family-friendly" in his interview

have you seen the first episode of "the boys" season 3 ?

it's a show owned by amazon

just imagine if someone posted that stuff on hive or steem or blurt ?

way worse than frot or lucy

they would get insta-banned

but amazon is somehow "considered mainstream" and yet can produce and distribute this stuff to viewers world-wide

what the hell


Posted from https://blurtlatam.com

  ·  7 days ago  ·  

And that's great, i love "hive" or at least what i thought "hive" was.

i just find it extremely difficult to imagine hivewatchers acting in "good faith".


Posted from https://blurtlatam.com

He's placating to the competition. He's getting "reduced attacks" for the blurt users on hive and the overall blurt blockchain in return for being obedient to them. He's willfully participating in the victim side of racketeering. He just implied he's not standing up to them, instead he's being obedient to their demands in return for not being attacked.

So we have diplomacy with hive "attackers", but none with the actual investors of blurt?

With this logic he may as well just kill blurt and it's price all together...oh that's what he just did. At hive's beckoning! Unbelievable, while many suffer huge financial loss. Just before all this, people were only talking about buying and powering up more.....hive certainly couldn't have that. What if blurt in 6 months was 15 cents and growing and hive still under 50 cents? Holy shit, that would not be good now would it...

Hive and Steemit in recent months have both recognized blurt as viable competition and a threat....so @megadrive lays down on the sword for them. Frankly unreal. Never saw this coming. Shame on me for being so naive.

  ·  6 days ago  ·  

I’m starting to wonder if Blurt can really grow with all this nonsense.

  ·  4 days ago  ·   (edited)

I don’t know how decentralised any of these platforms are and not even sure they are a good return on investment posting unless ppl are really on the inside and know when to trade the tokens for maximum gains. Look at ppl on them consistently posting since 2017/18 keeping all the money in, not trading. Steevc slobberchops good examples and after 5 years can only maybe buy a nice car and it could yet be worth £0 after all those years. I think drutter said something similar like he’s put almost ten years of work in its now close to worthless. That’s actually not that great use of time of your putting a lot in and just keep your money there. People could earn that same money in 3 months in a highly skilled job which, in five years of the same amount of time input you could easily learn a skill and become amazing at it to earn that. For people in third world countries or who cannot work that kind of money would be fantastic but I think overall getting good at trading is the better way to go if people want money. Or just working on a skill. So then we come down to the social implication and then I imagine most people are fighting for decentralisation and free speech else better to just stick with fb and instagram if you just want online friends.

  ·  6 days ago  ·  

well, i was somewhat concerned when mega talked about blurt being "family-friendly" in his interview

have you seen the first episode of "the boys" season 3 ?

it's a show owned by amazon

just imagine if someone posted that stuff on hive or steem or blurt ?

way worse than frot or lucy

they would get insta-banned

but amazon is somehow "considered mainstream" and yet can produce and distribute this stuff to viewers world-wide

what the hell


Posted from https://blurtlatam.com

For real. There is a lot of concern here. And no I never hears of "the boys" and I'm kinda proud of that after reading what you wrote. I try to distance myself from what seems like disturbing propaganda passed off as entertainment.

Stop calling yourself "Foundation", this is very misleading.

Do you realize that in case "Blurt Foundation" and "SocialGraph Foundation" are not registered foundations it is very possible that you are running a crypto scam?

Congratulations!! your post has been curated by @blurt-network

Picsart_22-05-29_13-02-00-277.jpg

Use #blurt-network for more upvotes
SHARE THIS POST ON FACEBOOK TO EARN BLURT FROM BLURT-NETWORK

Follow Blurt-networkFacebook page Here



You can delegate blurt power to @blurt-network to support curation

  ·  10 days ago  ·  

Upvoted at the least for the classic "Closing Time" by Semisonic, Britpop at its finest! 🎸

  ·  8 days ago  ·  

Semisonic are from Minneapolis, so not exactly Britpop :) Still a good band though.

  ·  10 days ago  ·   (edited)

I read and watched the whole post. @ctime and @fervi did something wrong. Acknowledge wrongdoing and compromise quickly with @megadrive. It will be good for yours.

  ·  10 days ago  ·  

  ·  10 days ago  ·  

Some people like fights and quarrels. They do not understand the compromise. Expel these people from the blurt community. 😡😠😡

Blurtlogo.png

Thank you everyone 🌷❤️

  ·  10 days ago  ·  

I may well be naive here. . .but can someone explain if this whole freezing people's account is actually legal or not?
Cause from where I'm standing this can well be a crime to commit. . .freezing people's accounts and "stealing" their assets. . .

Is it within legal rights of @megadrive to do such thing?
Can someone enlighten me regarding law on this. . .

  ·  10 days ago  ·  

Sure, tho I'm not repeating myself to every identical question.
Please read this

  ·  10 days ago  ·  

You cannot call the police if you have let them all go.

Good God

  ·  10 days ago  ·  

What the hell …. Law ? Which Law ? There is no Law in Decentraland ????

  ·  9 days ago  ·   (edited)

Decentraland ????

One person controlling everything with a "printed stake" is not a decenterland. I would rather say it's a crypto scam, but that's not up to me to decide

  ·  9 days ago  ·  

Can you please share the link that shows how much is printed and how often is that done ? Maybe on the explorer. I want to see and at least learn about this. Someone already asked before about this, and I didn't found the answer. Maybe you can share that ?

45 M - socialgraph, initblurt accounts

  ·  10 days ago  ·  

no Law? how am I going to explain this to Jude Law? he was just about to sign up to Blurt. . . damn it. . .

  ·  10 days ago  ·  

I have screen shots and have sent them to my solicitors in the UK gal, they are superb and I will have an answer by noon tomorrow as to the legality of this, and as they are already working on 2 cases for me this will be a freebie for me.
I think this is them, if so they can expect a letter from my solicitors soon as this week.

The Blurt Foundation CIC
Lytchett House,
13 Freeland Park,
Wareham Road,
Poole,
Dorset BH16 6FA

Just in case megamouth reads this, my solicitors are Assist.Claims
1 Elveley Drive, West Ella, Hull, HU10 7RT

And they have multiple departments dealing with all manner of legalese.

Your WELCOME.

  ·  10 days ago  ·  

You are pursuing the wrong people, the Blurt Foundation above is a social enterprise helping people with depression.

UK courts have no jurisdiction over Blurt

  ·  10 days ago  ·  

We shall see, megamouth needs to sort his own mind out before he tries to help anyone, he needs to help himself as he seems fucking insane.

  ·  10 days ago  ·  

Why am I not surprised you already a step ahead of everything. . . well done brother. Keep us posted pls . . .

  ·  10 days ago  ·  

:-) I keep sharp on my KTM beast.
DSC_0072.JPG

  ·  10 days ago  ·  

Is This the same Ctime from Steemit ?

Ctime: https://steemit.com/dv/@ctime/message-to-hive-users

986E6752-8FB7-4549-931A-DD59BCE065F0.jpeg

9517B98C-0B88-451A-802E-392462429C1C.jpeg

BA2DE8B5-FCC9-4A21-8820-691D95950989.jpeg

4E09BC97-FD82-459B-A618-E7E3F11A51F6.jpeg

13AC0E6B-4128-4BBD-ADBB-83D2E3B5B360.jpeg

ECF6D461-79B0-464C-97EE-5F4D0A46A0AB.jpeg

  ·  10 days ago  ·  

Yes.

  ·  10 days ago  ·   (edited)

Thanks. I’m going to go get into my Ledger Time Machine and see what else I can find. Everything is there, forever.

  ·  10 days ago  ·  

Are you okay with freezing peoples assets? Making blurt the first zero trust shitcoin on the planet?
Dare disagree with megagobshite and he freezes your account, this is disgusting behavior.

  ·  10 days ago  ·  

Firstly, you'd take that level of abuse and threats and lies?
Would you not protect what you built?
It actually might be fun to fork off as a 4chain - this was even discussed with a couple of people.
But this isn't it.

Anyway, to your question, I had to seek clarification - I knew that would trigger even more ejaculations! I hope he edits it. Even the edit won't make anyone happy clappy, but at least will be accurate. I know what it looks like coz I had one of my accounts "frozen" by those charmers at Steemit during the JSun takeover. No, they didn't take my coins, the wallet wasn't frozen or disabled or emptied but the social abilities to post and vote were disabled. So I was still able to withdraw my coins. just couldn't interact anymore. So, I would have picked a better word and defined it, as I now have, so then we can argue about whether it would achieve anything. There were so many get-arounds, even on Steem, that it was more an annoyance.

I may even post on this as is another chain aspect few really grasp - which is why the wallet is separate from the blogging - the distinction between an asset and its functions.

  ·  10 days ago  ·  

show me what has been said? If you agree with making blurt the first zero trust token on the planet, then excuse me when I crush it, because I can, choose a side, ethics and morals or touchy feely bullshit.

I am surprised you all want to commit suicide, megamoron is a moron, and all the hangers on like offgridlife that know fuck all about living off grid is mildly amusing but asinine to say the least.

  ·  8 days ago  ·  

Not the first, Steemit did it before and I'm sure many others.

  ·  7 days ago  ·  

Hence why they have a bad rep. I did like blurt although megamouth just cannot keep his shut, he wanted to buy drones to bomb people in the Ukraine, that was his first brainfart, but the diarrhea coming from his mouth never stops, this is what you get when you surround yourself with "yes men" like he has, they all get paid a trickle to keep them in delusional line, for megamouths god complex.

  ·  10 days ago  ·  

Here's a simple suggestion...

Stop using Discord and STOP having so many "Private" chats in the first st place.

You guys really are just a Hair better than the team at STEEM who actually built this Blockchain. Sorry I can't boast anymore than that. ... Truly an unprofessional Shit show like I'm used to on the other chains...
And using Hivewatchers for ANY reason makes you a Criminal in my book so you know 😐

Jacob has my number if you wish to SPEAK to me as I am disabled and will not use discord and slack.

You can also just ignore me as IF I have no effect but I have been around from the start and happen to know quite a bit about what you've got going on here. ... Under the circumstances, STEEM is looking better each day because Humans are lying dirty bastards who can't play fair and Openly on a Blockchain... But there are better ways to fix it rather than becoming ANOTHER crime front like Hivewatchers.

Regards.

Screenshot_20220618-220503.png

Steem is actually rly unproblematic and fine since the hive cabal left. I never rly see any issues there just not much community but it is growing maybe all the blurt ppl should post there too so we can support each other across both chains.

Not a bad idea.

Thanks a lot sir for informing about their bad intentions! I didn't know people can do such cheap behave for controlling over the blockchain.

Blurt is the best decentralized social media platform. I aren't afraid of price decreasing.

Posted from https://blurtlatam.com

  ·  8 days ago  ·  

Too many cowards.

untitled.gif

  ·  8 days ago  ·  

Really?
I don't think so.
Every person has his own opinions.


Posted from https://blurtlatam.com

  ·  8 days ago  ·  

I still think there are too many cowards. You haven't convinced me... but thank you for your opinion.


Posted from https://blurtlatam.com

  ·  8 days ago  ·  

I don't need to convince anyone.
Your life you will live and my life I.
If you think it's cowards, then no problem.
You're strong, I appreciate you.
OK? Happy?


Posted from https://blurtlatam.com

  ·  7 days ago  ·  

Much love to you @nazirhussain


Posted from https://blurtlatam.com

  ·  9 days ago  ·  

open your eyes

  ·  8 days ago  ·  

You mean my eyes are closed. You should know what is wrong and what is right.


Posted from https://blurtlatam.com

  ·  10 days ago  ·  

All the best for you sir, let's make blurt the better place for all of us 😍

  ·  10 days ago  ·  

"@ctime has on many occassions lorded powering down and crashing the price over the community if he doesn't get his way and latest threats to dox the foundation team which is highly dangerous to the security of Blurt as all hold witness positions"

I think it's obvious that if someone was buying BLURT because there was a promise of "greater decentralization" then once that promise is cancel they can start selling BLURT. Is it @ctime's fault or the people who changed the rules during the game a month before the deadline?

"But he didn't do that, all he wanted to do was to gain maximum power over users and even thought the foundation would cowtow to him and beg for funding and having to justify every single bit of dev work we do via proposal which he will control, being the then largest stakeholder."

So if, for example, the "Foundation" controls the situation it is ok and if someone else has control it is bad? The argument makes no sense. Will the biggest stakeholder approve bad solutions in proposals? That would work against them!

"Given the aforementioned threat and the continued bullying that happens on chain by individuals that take freedom of speech too far and use this freedom to threaten other individuals or to threaten the financial stability of the blockchain, which @ctime has done."

Freedom of speech by definition cannot go too far. When someone goes to jail for what they said (e.g. in my country theoretically promoting communism is a criminal responsibility) they don't go there because they "abused their freedom of speech" they go there because they broke the law. By the way, this law is not enforced at all because even in our parliament we have parties that preach communist ideas.

"I, at the time approached the witnesses in the channel to gather their thoughts on the notion of giving @ctime notice to wind up his affairs within 30 to 40 days on Blurt before we freeze his account, having been given fair warning, this would extend to bullies on the chain that persecute our users."

Wow, this is really stupid. Why would someone in the future buy BLURT and freeze BP when they can be taken away from them? The word freeze sounds better than steal, right? So your BLURTs are no longer yours even if you buy them?

Generally it all comes down to who controls the blockchain, right? So isn't it better to write that outright, what are the rules of the game, rather than giving people false hopes? There is nothing wrong with a centralized concept but it should be clearly declared. However, there is a weak point in all this - how is it actually different from Facebook, Twitter and why should people use blurt.blog if there is not even a guarantee that their account will not be "frozen"?

  ·  10 days ago  ·  

on the topic of freezing, i agree 100%.

bitcoin for example cannot be frozen by anyone. giving conplete individual control to the wallet holder. If my assets can be frozen for the mere biased opinion of megadrive and his free will to do so wothout even a consensus call is by far an obvious flag of "do not invest into this platform". I hope these things get rectified. i have been trading blurt on ioniny and have accumulated about 10k blurt there. i was going to power it all up but after all this i am second thinking that decision.

  ·  10 days ago  ·  

Ctime is Double-u …. MK, @yvonne-b and 127 others…

They are the same.

They just threaten to Powerdown and sell all their Blurt whenever they don’t get their way .

  ·  8 days ago  ·  

They just threaten to Powerdown and sell all their Blurt whenever they don’t get their way .

If this is a crime, and their individual stake is so much that it threatens the chain if they leave, there seems to be a major problem about.

  ·  8 days ago  ·  

People can do whatever they want. People can power down whenever they want. No crime.

  ·  10 days ago  ·  

What's so strange about that? The same way the "other side" would sell if any variant implemented on blockchain didn't satisfy them.

I'm surprised that you can freeze someone's account here for any reason. The person who was behind this idea destroyed BLURT and anyone who finds out about it will withdraw their funds. Blaming someone else for the price drop is like Elon Musk saying Bill Gates is shorting Tesla. The problem is that the guy himself sold $38 billion worth of stock he owns and he is most responsible for the TSLA price drop.

Civilization developed not because people fought each other but because they worked together. In every war two sides lose, in every cooperation two sides benefit.

  ·  10 days ago  ·  

This is a good move. The price will recover and ultimately the chain will be stronger for the removal of these influences.

Aren't you a huge hive supporter?

  ·  6 days ago  ·  

Aren't you a proven liar?

https://blurt.blog/@trade-n-travel

You think th price will recover ctime double u and both the two m’s leaving along with pushing off someone most the top investors here like curating ( Lucy Lin) your more positive than me that’s for sure. I feel I totally wasted my time investing so much effort here for months

This makes no sense. Driving off top investors who have been supporting the price and the community through curation. This wreaks of foul play.

Please read my post from last night. It is logical to conclude the attack on price was caused by this top investor (Ctime, Mk and mmmkkk are all the same person) that has seen us lose well over half the value in one week. I also noticed that this same investor targeted you before on Steem.

https://steemit.com/dv/@ctime/message-to-hive-users

attack on world pro.png

  ·  10 days ago  ·  

Prove it was him them, go on prove it.

I already have in my last post, by quoting and referencing his own admissions.

https://blurt.blog/blurt/@practicalthought/power-to-the-people-isn-t-what-the-current-dark-cloud-is-about

  ·  10 days ago  ·  

I thought more of you than this, if you think stealing a mans coins no matter who he is is okay, then you are no friend of mine.
You are OK with making blurt the first trust-less coin on the planet are you?
Welcome to blurt, invest, but if we do not like what you say we will take your coins, what a fucking joke, hive must be in stitches watching this shit show!

How about lucylin, you think it is OK to freeze a guy who only has a few pennies, because megagobshite does not like his words, if you agree with that, you disgust me.

if you think stealing a mans coins no matter who he is is okay, then you are no friend of mine.

I've only had a handful of friends in my life for the record. Now onto your first assertion.

Whose coins have been stolen? Lets stick to the facts.

I'm not in favor of the freezing, but it isn't what you are being led to believe at all.

The whale that seeks to be the new king of Blurt was told he has I believe 40 days to liquidate his wallets and remove them from Blurt. Unlike what happened at Steem there is no theft taking place here.

And when I say he seeks to be the new king, I mean just that. He claims power to the people, but what he seeks is to control the Dao so he can vote unopposed the diversion of it to his own pockets as we have seen many times on the other chains. Those of our stature never have a vote that counts on those proposals.

I'm not sure how this guy has spun himself into being some sort of hero in all of this when his motives are selfish.

So far I've seen no official statement regarding Lucylin. But even moreso than my dislike over the freezing of MMMKKK who I see as wanting to be top dog, I also would not be in favor of Lucylin being in effect told to leave.

I'm not in charge of what goes on here, but I believe the best route the foundation could have taken would have been to fork as Hive did, excluding not only the whale who seeks to be king, but the many accounts and exchanges who have simply sat on the tokens. It would greatly reduce the amount of tokens in play while simultaneously allowing the Foundation to restructure the several mistakes they admit they made when they created Blurt.

It would have then left the structure and maintenance in the hands of the new king, who upon being questioned multiple times on who would continue on running the structures and maintaining them always pointed that responsibility would still for some reason rest in the hands of those he sought to replace.

If I'm not mistaken, the design of all these platform is for a "new king" to take control. It's called buying a shit load of blurt and pushing the price up. That's why all these whales have always said if you don't like.....then buy more hive/steem/blurt and then you will have the power to.....

Here at blurt....if you buy the product you don't get any decision making power, you are just looked at like a threat, especially if you have opposing views to the founders.

In other words, if you don't like something then buy more blurt! Then you will think you have the power to change things, but in reality the founders will just threaten to freeze your account and force you to liquidate your position for a massive loss.

As you refer to kings of the platform....I'm happy to receive the "king" that pushes my investment up, not down. Then receive the next "king" that buys them out, and so on. By king #3 or #4 we should have a nice 30 cent price, but going against the natural economic design combined with artificial interference to maintain power, we have jack shit and major loses. But I guess major investors powering down and destroying the price and support to bloggers, combined with damage of trust and reputation to the platform is ok with you, and worth it?

Also what is up with your continued power down? You claimed to have started it because the foundation may be abandoning the platform....they have made it clear that they are not, yet you still powerdown? Do as you wish of course, but seems like you too are sending mixed signals.

Loading...
  ·  10 days ago  ·  

How the fuck not to run anything by the blurt foundation and the morons they delegated to that chose to be suck up shitheads, why the fuck I came here I have no idea, and boy have you lot fucked up.

  ·  10 days ago  ·  

"The whale that seeks to be the new king of Blurt was told he has I believe 40 days to liquidate his wallets and remove them from Blurt. Unlike what happened at Steem there is no theft taking place here." Says fucking who?

"And when I say he seeks to be the new king, I mean just that. He claims power to the people, but what he seeks is to control the Dao so he can vote unopposed the diversion of it to his own pockets as we have seen many times on the other chains. Those of our stature never have a vote that counts on those proposals."

Prove it.

"So far I've seen no official statement regarding Lucylin. But even moreso than my dislike over the freezing of MMMKKK who I see as wanting to be top dog, I also would not be in favor of Lucylin being in effect told to leave."
prove it.

You all demand proof from me, I provide it, always have, all I see here is paranoia and speculation, you got your head so far up megatossers ass it is insane, like he is, you have all fucking ruined any trust this shit coin had, what a bunch of cunts, you had a good thing going, you fucked up not me, you all fucked up, massive congrats you bunch of easily offended paranoid FUCKTARDS!

  ·  10 days ago  ·   (edited)

If you scroll up and read this post we are commenting on the information you are having a hard time finding on potential freezing and time frames to leave is there in the body of the post. Reading is your friend.

😉

The same with the week long non stop barrage of verbiage from your benefactor. I can't read that for you either.

It's ironic that you keep talking about being offended, paranoia and speculation and having a head up anothers ass as you exhibit all of these attributes in your rage posts. One of us in this exchange taking place is calm and the other is quite clearly offended and its pretty easy for onlookers to determine which is which.

You might also wish to read my statement to you that I'm not a fan nor advocate for the way the current freeze is being talked of being implemented either. But that would be the logical thing to do and wouldn't feed the fire you need to rage hard at this moment.



Posted from https://blurtlatam.com

  ·  10 days ago  ·  

😀

  ·  10 days ago  ·  

It's starting to sound that way...

  ·  10 days ago  ·  

If I have power over Blurt, I will freeze your account first. So as not to be stolen.

  ·  10 days ago  ·  

No one touches my account but me

  ·  10 days ago  ·  

Investors come and investors go. Blurt has survived it all and will go from strength to strength. If the price drops it is an opportunity for others to accumulate and dilute the centralisation of high stakes accounts.

  ·  10 days ago  ·  

You are deluded.

Not rly it didn’t really ever come back from double u leaving but that was fair enough now the other biggest three that will take a long time to replace in a bear market

  ·  10 days ago  ·  

The shit will dive to the bottom ... they will farm like they used to before the community came. In a few projects the same is done ... investors deceived . The law of the street requires justice

  ·  10 days ago  ·  

  ·  10 days ago  ·   (edited)

He...he... Steem, Hive, Blurt :)

  ·  10 days ago  ·  

...so what´s next ?

  ·  10 days ago  ·  

I am creating a new Blockchain. Theskeptic.io … See you there.

  ·  10 days ago  ·  

Everyone should make their own one-person blockchain. There would be peace of mind. ;-)

  ·  10 days ago  ·  

Any details?


Posted from https://blurt.live

  ·  10 days ago  ·  

It will be from scratch. No airdrops. Everyone has to pay.

  ·  10 days ago  ·  

Blurt.blog is awesome community ✌️✌️. Fraudsters have no place here 👍.

Blurtlogo.png

Thank you everyone 🌷🌻🌼

  ·  10 days ago  ·   (edited)

manipulator. The issue with the fact that the blurt will drop to 0.001 has nothing to do with the fact that the people you accuse of it have such an intention. If you read their conversations, you can immediately see that the matter concerns the fears that the FOUNDATION prints millions of blurts and regularly puts them on the stock exchange when the blind soars up and with the date 07.07. You know that this is what these comments are about. You are just attacking people who discover the scam, which only proves that you are a part of it ..

The threat of freezing an account, on the other hand, is beneath all dignity. People like Mariuszkarowski came here to get away from the dictatorship that was on the hive in the hope that they would finally find a blockchain in which freedom of speech and free market decentralization and freedom of speech. By threatening to freeze their account, you prove that you are even worse than hive downvoteers who demonetize content inconsistent with their views but never freeze anyone's account or funds.

I personally think that the only person who should freeze the account here is you. I have followed your actions since the very beginning and I did not like them. but now you have outdone yourself.

shame

This comment reminds me all the times I heard @practicalthought talk highly about blurt as it respected property rights. Freezing of accounts, threats of freezing accounts, giving 40 days to liquidate accounts.....where is the respect of property rights now? This is not twenty or one-hundred, or even a thousand bucks we are talking about here. This is major life changing money for many of us.

Property rights? Frankly I'm afraid to hold my money here now, or what is left of it.

  ·  6 days ago  ·   (edited)

Frankly I'm afraid to hold my money here now, or what is left of it.

and for exactly the same reason I withdraw my blurts. On 07.07 or also the foundation aroused my concerns, but I haven't pressed powerdown yet. that's what the @megadrive declaration did. because how can I know if after these 40 days I will not be on the list because I support @mariuszkarowski or from any other reason?

It's beyond fucked up. I always talk about building confidence in the platform, building confidence in the investor. WTF were they thinking? Fortunately, it seems like @jacobgadikian has talked some sense into @megadrive a long with an overwhelming outcry of public disapproval. I don't think worry about freezing accounts is an issue any more. I'll be canceling my powerdown the moment @ctime and MK cancel theirs. But at the moment, it looks like a clear race to the exits. Total shame, and frankly there is no other place to put the blame but on one single person. From a pure business perspective, this blunder is one for the record books, at least it looks like they are now trying to correct their wrong. Watch for a post from me in the next 24 hrs, as I'll make a last ditch attempt to bring people to the table.

  ·  10 days ago  ·  

It's like Elon Musk saying that Bill Gates is shorting Tesla and he himself sold his shares for $38 billion. What a clown he is. :-)

  ·  10 days ago  ·  

Those who have been robbing for years ... steem, hive, blurt, it's time to end this and start a war.

So you want to freeze or force sell the accounts of two of the largest investors of the platform and drive the price to nothing? That is the plan? @megadrive?

  ·  10 days ago  ·   (edited)

Talk to yourself mark

  ·  8 days ago  ·  

Sure you are...

  ·  10 days ago  ·  

Seems legit. For winter, they should make an advertising slogan - "BLURT: BUY MORE - FREEZE MORE".

I’ve spent ages blogging here going to take a few profits if I can in time and come back in at the bottom should have done it a few weeks ago

It’s insane right this will tank

  ·  10 days ago  ·  

@megadrive is a dumb fucking faggot, everyone point and laugh...

  ·  10 days ago  ·  

He is worse than that.

This is suicide for the price of blurt. I did not know you were being influenced by hivewatchers. This is not a business decision, this is something else all together. Would you be willing to explain why some of the biggest supporters of content creators and investors in blurt need be treated in this manner? I think this is over the top, and totally destructive for platform.

  ·  10 days ago  ·  

hehe so might be you all have heard better before the arguments from double-u and his so called German gang, its not what it looks like you have to see behind the wall of media driven brainwashing from the top guys here who now try to freeze accounts that´s the same shit what happened on Steemit and Hive before and all introduced by the same guys that´s more than a shame and now megadrive seems to show his real face because this is so weird, that´s far beyond everything what´s ok we had this before with the german witnessescheck it out, so if your an enemy or one who could become dangerous for their power they easily get them on the cold way, freeze sending out manipulating posts to paint the truth, what the hell has this to do with free speech ??? I don´t get it !!!

And those are your, mine, our leaders here on this platform -we have said it before, but nobody wants to listen, and have kissed the feet of the false prophets.

...now the damage is done so silly, one can only stand beside and wonder what will happend next maybe the great PFUNK will come and take over together with his powerfull friends from HIVE !?

While I'm not in favor of any freezing of accounts it's not quite the same. Justin just took the wallets (theft), the way it was presented here is that they will have more than one month to move their assets out.

  ·  10 days ago  ·  

I am not kidding here, I have emailed my solicitor with regards you treating the Polish guy so badly, I live in PL now, but my solicitors are in the UK if this is blurt, they can expect real mail, not email, and possibly a court case The Blurt Foundation CIC
Lytchett House,
13 Freeland Park,
Wareham Road,
Poole,
Dorset BH16 6FA

Ok and that concerns me because...

  ·  10 days ago  ·  

Because if you agree with theft then you are as guilty as the lunatic you seem so desperate to suck up to, I thought more of you than a thief. a thief is disgusting

  ·  8 days ago  ·  

That Blurt foundation you listed from the UK is this place https://www.blurtitout.org/

I don't think they have anything to do with the blockchain.

  ·  10 days ago  ·   (edited)

In addition to this, I was told that @fervi was being represented on Hive as CTO of Blurt, having replaced @jacobgadikian. I don't know who spread that info, but it is very false.

Nonsense you and he manipulate prices in robiniaswap projects, defy, dig. You scaming and jacobgadikian is this scamer ... https://twitter.com/gadikian

If you rob the investor @mariuszkarowski you will have a war on the network ...

  ·  10 days ago  ·  


Loading...
  ·  10 days ago  ·  

You have lost your mind when you want to freeze any account, and lucylins account for what, for what he says, how fickle your poor deluded soul must be, a minnow with a paltry stake and only opinion, what threat is he BIGMAN? Or is it megamouth? Me next is it for daring to have an opinion of how insane you are, how YOU are running this site into oblivion?
I joined here and immediately set about getting this sites value up, it hit 9 cents in the first month or two, yes only on hive engine, but that was all me, you should be selling this site as a positive experience, not your own emotional train wreck, and hive watchers are hated, and you are dealing with them low life? Says a lot more about you than your shitty words and actions do.

I said last night I had never seen anything like this, and you just made it worse than I could ever imagine, stock and laughing, re arrange them.

  ·  10 days ago  ·  

They picked the wrong guy to work on a free SPEACH platform... That part's for sure.

Mega should perhaps just stick to Gamestate or whatevs... 🤬🥓

  ·  10 days ago  ·  

Shame as I liked the people on here, but if they want to freeze accounts of people that do not agree with them then there is no point being on here, and the price of the token reflects that.

  ·  10 days ago  ·  

He needs buying out so he can go run a kindergarten and be 1 of the inmates.

  ·  10 days ago  ·  

Im out...

Please do keep in touch if you have me anywhere else, i use most social media woth PhusionPhil and dont want to be affiliated with this horseshit anymore.

This is the 3rd piece of garbage trash blockchain blog i have invited people to, just to be insulted by the stupidity of a CDN owner

Fuck this platform and its cat cow slave bitch owners.

  ·  10 days ago  ·  

Are you on Bastyon?

  ·  8 days ago  ·  

should i be? I got banned from fagbook again today

  ·  7 days ago  ·  

Certainly have a look at it, interesting project

https://bastyon.com/about

Do you earn tokens on it? I might pop over too and have a look.

  ·  7 days ago  ·  

Not really at the momement...they have changed that around, and although i have in the past i dont seem to be at the momement. They are really focussed on making it bomb proof to internet censorship...the encrypted chat is the best around. Look me up https://bastyon.com/frot ive been on it for years and am probably a whale, and the tokens are still worth $1.08 even after this crash. Im not posting much, but do want to run a node if i ever work out how, i certainly have the tokens to do it!

  ·  10 days ago  ·  

I will find you brother, likes ya style, I am out of here too, stay lucky brother.

Loading...
  ·  10 days ago  ·  

Blurt has become the hope to many people including me I plan a future on blurt and I know many also but that a single person whose interest is only self and not for the good of all community members is indeed a devil 😈 incarnate and should not be allowed to achieve such ill plans. Decentralized technology, fairness and transparency. Don't be too greedy .

Thank you for the mention. It looks like you are preparing to try to commit a crime.
I wrote this comment 30 minutes ago. I was wrong
https://blurt.blog/decentralization-day/@mariuszkarowski/rdpms7

  ·  10 days ago  ·  

I think you have a very limited understanding of blockchain governance. No crime is being committed we are simply asking you to leave our community and discussing options if you continue to be a threat.

  ·  9 days ago  ·  

"we" being just a small band of individuals. in the case of lucylin it is just you.

get a consensus call for freezing. its the least you could do.

  ·  9 days ago  ·  

A threat via words, my your fickle soul is so dull, you just want to hang on to the fake foundation, a free ride, not happening, even your tax status is being scrutinized, you have some wake up calls coming, some sleepless nights, a few summons, and a shit load of pain on the way via legalese, by the way, your welcome.

  ·  10 days ago  ·  

Man... Turn in your resignation and get the Fuck off the property 😶

Seriously!

  ·  9 days ago  ·  

He is getting a shit load of pain soon via my solicitors as he is in the UK and so are they, thank me later, much later, doing this for fun as I hate his libtard potty mouth, and I have 4 private pensions to drawdown, and fuck all better to do than bring down a fake tyrant.

  ·  8 days ago  ·  

He isn't in the UK.

At least try to get some facts right in your grandiose lying.

  ·  8 days ago  ·  

Suck my balls after I have been in the sun all day long. Prove it.

I didn’t realise md was in the Uk! I thought he was in nz. If he was in the Uk he should have turned up to the Uk meetup 😁

  ·  7 days ago  ·  
  ·  8 days ago  ·  

I have as much time for old liars as I have for old idiots.

Which is not very much

  ·  10 days ago  ·  

png.png

Threat to what? You have very limited understanding of dpos

You want me leave too? WE - means who?

  ·  10 days ago  ·  

Un fucking believable, I thought I had seen it all on here, I have now.

  ·  10 days ago  ·  

if the fuhrers that be freeze may account before most of power down - can i lend some rent money ?lolol

I still haven't seen any official mention of your account being frozen. I also would point out that while I'm not a fan of accounts being frozen, the language that has been presented is that they have time to move their assets off the platform, not the wallet type grab Justin Sun did.